Motorsport.com

Why McLaren had limited strategic options to beat Verstappen in Japan

McLaren says it had to choose between potentially sacrificing Oscar Piastri or losing time to Max Verstappen on new hard tyres when it came to Lando Norris’ Japanese Grand Prix strategy, which explains the decision to pit the Briton on the same lap as the Red Bull driver.

Team principal Andrea Stella has explained the team’s strategic options following a drab affair at Suzuka, which he felt had limited tactical latitude given the low levels of degradation experienced over the weekend.

When questioned about potentially pitting Norris sooner to gain an undercut on Verstappen, Stella reckoned that this would have left Piastri susceptible to the cars that had already pitted when it came to his own stop – and that the Australian was prioritised in order to cover the likes of Charles Leclerc and George Russell.

He also noted the safety car window in that scenario, stating that any chance of a pause in proceedings due to an accident would have immediately killed off the team’s chances of a bigger points haul.

“It’s unclear whether we could [do the undercut] but I think pitting Lando [first], it would have meant that we could not pit Oscar, and this would have been a problem for Oscar,” Stella explained.

“We would have waited, which I think would have been a problem with other cars, especially Russell, that pitted and that we needed to cover.

“We will review obviously the gaps in terms of time to understand whether there was a possibility to go for an undercut with Lando that could actually be executed on Max. 

Oscar Piastri, McLaren

Photo by: Mark Thompson – Getty Images

“We don’t have to forget though that, by giving up track positions, you also expose the car that you pit to safety car risk, for instance. Lando would have lost positions in a safety car should one be deployed.

“In hindsight, if you don’t see any safety cars, you think ‘oh yeah I might have gone for the undercut’, but an undercut attempt comes with some risks.

“It was apparent that the degradation was low, so I think if you lose position with a safety car, it’s lost. I don’t think we could have overtaken a Ferrari or a Mercedes today.”

Stella also felt that an overcut strategy was not possible, as the pace advantage of fresh hard tyres versus the worn mediums would have simply maintained the status quo – but with Norris even further behind.

Read Also:

  • Formula 1Lando Norris on Max Verstappen pitlane clash: “Last guy I expect to give me any space”

He again noted the pace of the earlier-stopping Russell on hard tyres, which meant that the team could not risk pitting any later than Verstappen.

“I think the problem for Lando [on an overcut] would be that he would have lost positions to some other cars, including Oscar,” the Italian added. “They’d pitted and they were faster, and if you stay out on a 20-lap used medium, you cannot be faster than somebody that pitted on a hard.

“The situation became very clear when Russell pitted, and he was very fast on a new hard. I think the overcut works well when you know that you gain like in Barcelona or in Suzuka in the past, you gain four or five laps of tyre delta. Then, even if you pit behind a car that stopped before, you will pass him because you have better tyres.

“But here, the tyres don’t almost degrade at all from one lap to the other.”

In this article
Jake Boxall-Legge
Formula 1
Lando Norris
Oscar Piastri
McLaren
Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Source

Leave feedback about this

  • Quality
  • Price
  • Service

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image
Choose Video